<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detecting Related Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/</link>
	<description>smart business solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:10:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregg O</title>
		<link>http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/comment-page-1/#comment-2089</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/#comment-2089</guid>
		<description>Be careful when trusting the Get (Last Error) method to check on the validity of your Go to Related Record script step. It is possible to get a 101 error even while the Go to Related Record step has &quot;successfully&quot; completed.

You get a &quot;false&quot; 101 error if all following are true:
1. you select the &quot;Match all records in current found set&quot; option
2. the record on which you happen to be sitting—when the gtrr script step runs—has no related records
3. at least one other originating record has valid related record(s).

In the above case, Filemaker will deliver you to the related found set AND give you a 101 &quot;record is missing&quot; error!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful when trusting the Get (Last Error) method to check on the validity of your Go to Related Record script step. It is possible to get a 101 error even while the Go to Related Record step has &#8220;successfully&#8221; completed.</p>
<p>You get a &#8220;false&#8221; 101 error if all following are true:<br />
1. you select the &#8220;Match all records in current found set&#8221; option<br />
2. the record on which you happen to be sitting—when the gtrr script step runs—has no related records<br />
3. at least one other originating record has valid related record(s).</p>
<p>In the above case, Filemaker will deliver you to the related found set AND give you a 101 &#8220;record is missing&#8221; error!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/comment-page-1/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>hmm, I use it most of the time. In every table I have a field called One - a number field - which has an auto entered value of 1 - I always assumed this was a safe bet to use. I have never had it fail on it ... but these comments are worth considering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, I use it most of the time. In every table I have a field called One &#8211; a number field &#8211; which has an auto entered value of 1 &#8211; I always assumed this was a safe bet to use. I have never had it fail on it &#8230; but these comments are worth considering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Coffey</title>
		<link>http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Coffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>@barbara: I&#039;m with you there. I used to use &lt;code&gt;IsValid()&lt;/code&gt; for this until I was...ahem...educated on the subject by the FileMaker luminary, Darren Terry several years ago. Luckily, it&#039;s not a hard habit to break. And I agree, I end up using &lt;code&gt;not IsEmpty()&lt;/code&gt; most often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@barbara: I&#8217;m with you there. I used to use <code>IsValid()</code> for this until I was&#8230;ahem&#8230;educated on the subject by the FileMaker luminary, Darren Terry several years ago. Luckily, it&#8217;s not a hard habit to break. And I agree, I end up using <code>not IsEmpty()</code> most often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Cooney</title>
		<link>http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Cooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/detecting-related-records/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always used the &lt;code&gt;IsValid()&lt;/code&gt; before a GTTR. Hmm. I believe I was taught that it meant &quot;if the relationship is valid...&quot; 

I&#039;ll change to &lt;code&gt;not isempty()&lt;/code&gt;, because I typically setup my if elses to be 

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;
If positive
 do something
else
 whatever
endif.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

Gonna be hard to break the &lt;code&gt;isvalid()&lt;/code&gt; habit. Thanks for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always used the <code>IsValid()</code> before a GTTR. Hmm. I believe I was taught that it meant &#8220;if the relationship is valid&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll change to <code>not isempty()</code>, because I typically setup my if elses to be </p>
<pre><code>
If positive
 do something
else
 whatever
endif.
</code></pre>
<p>Gonna be hard to break the <code>isvalid()</code> habit. Thanks for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

